Nature Trumps: An L.A. River Blog compiled by Jay Babcock

River birds hit by avian botulism in Glendale Narrows, no government response yet

18 May, 2008 · 1 Comment

No pictures, but yesterday I witnessed Tony (the Duck Man) moving a large duck corpse into the open River water, trying to get it to sink. I asked him what was happening. He told me that there’s been a massive die-off of muscovy ducks, mallards, geese and drakes in the last week in the Atwater area of the Glendale Narrows, between the Sunnynook footbridge and the Los Feliz bridge.

Tony said the muscovy population has dropped over a few days from around 40 to around a dozen. The drakes are almost gone. There are only 7-8 geese left. The mallard hens are mostly gone, and we’re not seeing any baby ducks, which is extremely unusual. He said this happened once before, in 2001 or 2002. What’s happening now, he says, is avian botulism. Maggots eat the duck corpses, and then the surviving ducks eat the maggots, catch the virus and die.

The plague can be stopped if the corpses can be disposed of in time — that is, removed from the River and burned or buried, or sunk in the water.

Tony says his phone calls and letters to local government authorities and agency officials pleading for monitoring of the situation and prompt corpse disposal have gone unanswered. So, he’s doing what he can, himself. But he can’t be down there all the time, and the situation is made worse by the high heat…

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Mitch O’Farrell in Garcetti office admits to ordering River island clearcutting, refuses to meet with interested members of the public.

16 May, 2008 · 1 Comment

According to TIM WARNER at
http://www.atwatervillage.org/forum/threads.php?id=1521_0_13_0_C:

“FYI [CD13 deputy Mitch O'Farrell] and a botanist from the Army Corps. of Engineers walked the islands a couple weeks ago and the botanist marked the Arundo and some other vegetation for removal so that when they come back shortly to remove the Arundo root systems they can minimize the intrusion. The money is coming from a grant. [Mitch O'Farrell] also said they looked for birds nests and other signs of wildlife at that time to make sure they would not disturb anything…

In a later post late Thursday night, TIM WARNER reported: “Mitch says the project should be over within two weeks and that he will not have time to have a meeting before then. Sorry I wish I had better news than that. He also said that crews have started cleaning up the debris and will continue to do so over the next couple days and that it will hopefully be gone before the FOLAR clean up ["La Gran Limpieza," Friends of the L.A. River's annual volunteer clean-up of the River, scheduled for Saturday, May 17].

“I asked if in the future the public can have more involvement and prior knowledge of such work or proposed work and he said he would be happy to talk to and include members of the public in the process. He did mention there is the possibility of some more projects in the near future for any of you interested in finding out more. His email is: Mitch.ofarrell@lacity.org

In a later post this morning, TIM WARNER wrote, “I walked down there this morning and the amount cleared out is surprising. I also saw that a lot of the debris is still there. I have been getting email responses so I will follow up and see what other info. I can get.”

This whole series of events is just nuts and reflects poorly on LA City Council District 13 councilman Eric Garcetti.

Eric Garcetti is a very smart guy, who I’ve voted for, who I’ve met, and who who I admire and respect — but he’s also been very busy in the last six months, what with holding the president’s chair at City Council and campaigning all over the place for Obama.

Somehow I doubt that Eric knows about what his deputy [Mitch O'Farrell] is up to here. I can’t believe Eric would approve of the high-handed way in which river users, naturalists and advocacy organizations are being treated by his office–even Friends of the L.A. River can’t get through to these people.

Just doesn’t make sense.

The River is a BIGGER than CD13. It is not even completely in CD13’s jurisdiction, it also falls under other city council districts, county supervisorial districts, and so on, up to and including the federal level (Army Corps of Engineers), etc.

No single office or government agency has power in the River; and to the degree that one entity has any power, it certainly does not include the right to unilaterally order the chainsaw clearcutting/destruction of habitat by untrained workers.

CD13 should not be going into the River and doing stuff on its own, or even in tandem with a single botanist from ACE. They don’t have the right to do so. This is not their River to do with as they please.

This is a power-grab. It needs to be stopped.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Garcetti office-contracted workers are chainsawing cottonwood trees and other plants on River islands as part of misguided clearcutting operation

13 May, 2008 · 3 Comments

I’m hearing that Mitch O’Farrell (him again) at L.A. City Councilman Eric Garcetti’s office has contracted with “Aztec Fire Fuel Department” for two trucks’ worth of supposedly “at risk” individuals to cut out the bamboo-like arundo donax plant growth on the islands in the Glendale Narrows area of the River bordering Atwater Village.

However, the crews are not just cutting the arundo, but they’re also chainsawing everything else, including cottonwood trees, which are being cut down or having limbs sawed off. The arundo is not a hazard, and will grow back quickly anyway. There is no good reason to cut it, especially in a manner that removes other plants, bushes and trees while leaving the arundo root mass intact.

Wikipedia: “Minor infestations can be removed manually, as long as the entire root mass and all rhizome parts are removed. Its dense growth and thick root masses make manual or mechanical removal of above-ground mass of large clonal monocultures a slow, inefficient, and difficult process. Rhizome pieces buried under 1-3 m of soil may resprout, and the disturbance caused by physical removal to the soil and surrounding communities may be severe.”

Using chainsaws and axes to clearcut a major infestation of arundo is idiocy.

Making things even stupider, these guys are leaving the detritus (limbs and branches) on the concrete bank, or in the land between the freeway and the River. At least one of these large piles next to the freeway was set on fire recently—you can see the blackened earth from the bikepath.

So, in essence, the City is trucking people to the River, where they are cutting down trees and other plant growth, in order to create fire hazards. Notice how every step ensures that there will be more carbon in the atmosphere—you gotta admire the reverse evil genius at work here.

Here’s some video and pictures of today’s damage. I didn’t get any footage of the two dozen or so workers hooting and whistling at the females (including schoolgirls) passing through the area on the bikepath. There’s always tomorrow, I guess.







→ 3 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized

IT’S ALL VERY DE-MURALIZING: Hahamugna “Meeting of Styles” mural vandalized/erased with whitewash, apparently by County-hired workers operating under Soviet-style orders from County Supervisor Gloria Molina

16 April, 2008 · 2 Comments

What was there before the vandalism…

What’s there now, after the vandalism…

What used to be there…

What’s there now…

Click here to see more images of the mural that is now gone forever.

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized

Disturbing news.

15 April, 2008 · 1 Comment

I’m told that workers under contract with L.A. County whitewashed the entire “Meetings of Style” mural site over the weekend.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Molina still extorting FoLAR over properly permitted Meeting of Styles mural, which she wants completely whitewashed

2 April, 2008 · 4 Comments

L.A. wants to whitewash graffiti mural

By RAQUEL MARIA DILLON, Associated Press Writer
Tue Apr 1, 7:01 PM ET

LOS ANGELES – It was a graffiti artist’s dream come true: 10,000 square feet of concrete and a permit to paint. Families brought their kids to watch as hundreds of muralists, using their own materials and working for free, sprayed technicolor shades on the steep banks of an ugly, manmade riverbed.

Not everyone was pleased, however, with the results of the civic-minded effort, which had the city’s blessing but has rekindled debates over whether Los Angeles County should condone a practice it pays millions to combat.

Some politicians protested that parts of the mural are obscene and have attracted gang-related tags in a city where graffiti already mars homes, sidewalks and buildings. The county has given organizers until Wednesday to whitewash the mural, and neither side is backing down.

“It would be beautiful if the river went back to its natural stateand was actually a river and a park,” said Alex Poli, a graffiti artist and gallery owner known as “Man One.” “But right now we have concrete walls, so the next best thing is to beautify it with art.”

The site in question, a concrete canyon where a tributary, Arroyo Seco, meets the Los Angeles River, is surrounded by an industrial neighborhood on the edge of downtown and, like most of the river’s 51 miles, is hemmed in by artificial banks to control floods.

To obtain the permit from a maze of local governments and regulatory agencies, Poli enlisted the Friends of the Los Angeles River, an environmental organization that works with the multiple agencies that control the river.

Poli organized the public art project on a sunny weekend in September, and the artists created a canvas full of bold, abstract graffiti script and some edgy imagery: a sorcerer in a hoodie sweatshirt conjuring a spray can, an angel cradling a man, a pig in a suit smoking marijuana, the Hollywood sign in flames and scantily clad women.

County Supervisor Gloria Molina promptly demanded the mural’s removal, complaining that some of the images were inappropriate for a public art display near where city planners want to build bike paths. The environmental group’s mission is to protect the river, and “this seemed like an odd way to do it,” said Roxane Marquez, a Molina spokeswoman.

Marquez said Poli hasn’t kept his promise to organize a volunteer touchup crew to keep the surrounding concrete pristine and free of gang tags and extra graffiti.

Poli said the politicians don’t understand the difference between graffiti and graffiti art, which is exhibited in museums and galleries around the world.

“People still have trouble considering it art because we use a spray can,” he said.

In mid-October, some of the murals were whitewashed without warning. Molina and the Department of Public Works denied involvement, but in December, Molina got the county Board of Supervisors to pass an emergency motion giving the Friends of the Los Angeles River 90 days to paint over the murals or pay up to $70,000 for their removal.

[NOTE FROM NATURE TRUMPS: FoLAR did not obtain the permit--Man One did. The County's motion to charge a third party $70k will not stand up in court. Molina should be held in contempt by the public for using her position to extort a non-profit environmental advocacy organization.]

County crews removed about 60 million square feet of graffiti in 2006 at a cost of about $32 million, county officials have said.

The Friends group stands by the idea of having art by the river, spokeswoman Shelly Backlar said. But the organization, which is scrambling to rebuild its stock with the county and the agencies that supervise the river, concedes some of what the artist put into the mural might not belong there.

“It’s their permit and their event, and we’ve been pulled in because of the work that we do,” Backlar said. “It’s not what we thought it would be.”

City Councilman Ed Reyes, who originally supported Poli’s project and authorized the permit, said he regrets that decision because he believes the art has attracted gang members, who have added their tags to the riverbed walls.

The graffiti “spilled out of the river channel, into the sidewalks, onto the handrails, into buildings,” Reyes said. “Before it was a neutral place, but now we have clear indicators that rival gangs and taggers are showing up there.”

More tagging has steadily accumulated at the Arroyo Seco site since last fall. Other artists have primed their own pieces of concrete and added to the project, extending the murals a few dozen yards.

Poli condemns taggers but sees the more ambitious work as copycats — students learning from the masters. Tagging increased after parts of the mural were whitewashed, including offensive images directed at Molina and county officials.

“The county needs to wake up,” said Kalen Ockerman, who paints under the name “Mear One.” “The rest of the world is busy paying kids to do this stuff,” on album covers and billboards.

Poli considered painting over the murals, “because of all the grief.” He’s also talking to lawyers, hoping that a strongly worded letter will stop the county from billing the environmental group or his gallery.

“We did nothing illegal and we had permits,” he said. “We’re in the business of creating art, not destroying it.”

→ 4 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized

Upcoming L.A. River Bridges events

30 March, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Press release:

PANEL DISCUSSION
Thursday, April 10, 7pm at the Getty Center
FREE. Advance reservations required.

As part of its Conservation Matters lecture series, the Getty Conservation Institute hosts a spirited discussion about the debated future plans for the bridges.  Moderated by Larry Mantle, host of 89.3 KPCC’s AirTalk, the panel will include: Eric DeLony, noted bridge historian and author of Landmark American Bridges Gary Lee Moore, City Engineer of the City of Los Angeles Glen Dake, landscape architect and City of Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Commissioner.

For reservations call (310) 440-7300.

“BRIDGE MIX” TOUR AND ACTIVITY DAY
Sunday, April 13, 10am–4 pm
$30, $25 for LAC and FoLAR members; $10 for children 12 and under. Bridge guide available with admission.

This tour and activity day explores the First, Fourth, Sixth, and Seventh Street bridges, all of which span the river between downtown and Boyle Heights.  Sites along both banks of the river will feature presentations, explorations, and hands-on activities for both adults and children.  Topics will include architectural history and movie lore, river science and ecology, bridge building and engineering, and the Los Angeles River master plan.  Tour will include special access into the L.A. River basin.

Events co-presented by the Los Angeles Conservancy, the Friends of the Los Angeles  River, and the Getty Conservation Institute.  For information and tickets, visit www.laconservancy.org/bridges or call (213) 623-2489.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Garcetti office clarifies river governance issues…

22 March, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Mitch O’Farrell of Garcetti’s office (aka CD13) made a presentation at the Atwater Village Residents Association (AVRA) meeting Thursday night (Mar 13) in which he  acknowledged that the River is an absolute mess in terms of governance — there are at least three levels of government (and their agencies) with competing, and/or overlapping, claims of authority to make and enforce rules with regards to practically everything having to do with the River.

Mitch reported that there are inter-governmental (and extra-governemental) efforts underway to form a River Authority, a River Foundation and a River Corporation that would together resolve the situation. He anticipates a River Authority in place as early as this fall, its board make-up being similar to the one of the current River Management and Maintenance task force. This seems to me to be overly optimistic, but that’s what I understood him to be saying.

Mitch reported that in the interim, the actual governing authority for the portion of the L.A. River that runs through Atwater Village is the Army Corps of Engineers. Not CD13.

CD13 staff then handed out a sheet of “helpful phone numbers for River related services that are Atwater Village specific.”

None of the contacts are for CD13, all of them are Army Corps of Engineers — that’s who you’re supposed to call to request “repairs, vegetation, trash pick up, other concerns.” And for “problems that are environmental in nature, not maintenance related,” there’s another ACE number. Finally, for graffiti on the DWP Switching Station’s green tarp, you’re supposed to call the DWP.

In other words, in affirming that the A.C.E. is in charge here, and in providing contacts and numbers, CD13 <i>seems to be</i> backing off from working to ban use of the River in the Atwater Village area. We should be able to sit by the river in peace, again. Yippie!

So: I would encourage anyone encountering problems/intimidation from marauding Park Rangers to be in contact with Friends of the L.A. River, and/or with this blog. The River is yours: use it responsibly and respectfully!

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized